Overpaying the plusvalía municipal is easy: all it takes is not comparing the two methods of calculation, or accepting the assessment that arrives from the town hall without looking at it. Getting the money back is not so easy, and what decides whether it can be done is almost never the merits of the case: it is the route by which the payment was made and how much time has gone by. This guide sets out the routes, with their deadlines, and says plainly where the limits are.
The first thing to find out: which document you have
Before talking about deadlines you need to know whether what you paid was a self-assessment of your own or an assessment issued by the town hall. They are two different legal acts, even if the amount is identical and the form looks similar.
| Self-assessment | Assessment | |
|---|---|---|
| Who calculates | You, or whoever represents you | The town hall |
| How it arrives | You file it, with payment | It is served on you, with the deadline and appeals at the foot |
| How it is corrected | A request to rectify your own self-assessment | An appeal against the act served |
| Deadline | Four years | One month from service |
| If it is allowed to pass | There is still room until the limitation period runs out | The act becomes final and deemed accepted |
An assessment that has been served always carries a note on appeals at the foot: it says which appeal lies, before whom and within what period. A self-assessment does not, because it is not an administrative act but a declaration of your own. It is the quickest way of knowing which of the two columns you are in.
Route 1: rectifying a self-assessment
If you filed yourself and consider that the self-assessment harmed your legitimate interests, you can ask for it to be rectified and for the undue payment to be refunded. The deadline is the limitation period, four years, counted from the day after the end of the filing period or, if it was filed late, from the day after it was filed.
The request is addressed to the town hall or to the relevant tax management body, and it is supported with documents: the two escrituras (the public deeds of purchase and sale), the IBI bill (the annual municipal property tax) showing the land split, and the calculation under the method considered applicable. The most common grounds are these:
- The objective method was applied and the actual-gain method gave a lower base.
- There was no increase in the value of the land, so the transaction was not taxable.
- The share of the land in the total valor catastral (the official cadastral value) was taken wrongly.
- The years elapsed were miscounted, or a coefficient was applied that was not the one in the bylaw in force on the date the tax fell due.
- An allowance provided for in the bylaw and requested in time was not applied.
If the town hall does not reply, once the period for deciding has passed the request may be treated as rejected by silence, which opens the way to the next appeal. Silence counting as a refusal does not mean the matter is lost: it means you have to keep going.
Route 2: appealing an assessment that has been served
If the act is the town hall's, the Local Government Finance Act provides for an appeal for reconsideration before the same body that issued it, within one month of service. In large municipalities there is also a municipal economic-administrative body before which a claim can be brought, with its own procedure. Once the administrative route is exhausted, what remains is a judicial review appeal before the competent administrative court, with its deadlines and its costs.
And it is counted from service, not from when the envelope is opened or when you find out. If the notice was served electronically, the rules for counting have their own particular features, explained in the guide on counting deadlines. Losing that month is, by a long way, the most common way of ending up with no claim.
Appealing does not by itself suspend the obligation to pay. Suspension has to be requested and, except in the cases where it applies automatically, requires a guarantee. It is worth deciding this when bringing the appeal and not afterwards, when the enforcement period has already opened and the enforcement surcharge has appeared.
If the assessment is final
Here it pays to be clear, because this is where most expectations are raised. An assessment that was not appealed in time is a final act, deemed accepted, and the legal system offers no ordinary route to reopen it. What exists are extraordinary channels, with strict requirements:
- Review of acts void as a matter of law, limited to the closed list of grounds in the General Tax Act (LGT). Just any disagreement on the merits will not do.
- Revocation, which the administration may agree in the taxpayer's favour in the cases provided for by law. It is on the administration's initiative: the individual can prompt it but has no right to have it started.
- State liability for legislative acts, with its own requirements, deadlines and limits.
And there is one fact that conditions this whole area: the Constitutional Court's judgment 182/2021 itself limited the reach of its ruling as regards certain situations already settled on the date it was handed down. That does not end the analysis of each case, but it does explain why nobody serious can promise that a final assessment will be reopened. We study whether there is any way forward, say frankly when there is none, and do not take on a job that consists of selling an expectation that does not exist.
Deadlines, in a table
| Situation | Route | Deadline |
|---|---|---|
| Self-assessment filed by you | Rectification and refund of undue payments | Four years |
| Assessment served, still within time | Appeal for reconsideration | One month from service |
| Large municipality | Claim before the municipal economic-administrative body | Whatever its rules set |
| Administrative route exhausted | Judicial review before the administrative courts | Two months from service of the decision |
| Silence from the town hall | Treated as rejected, and you carry on | Depending on the procedure |
| Final assessment | Extraordinary channels | Closed-list requirements, no guarantee |
What to gather before claiming
- The payment document: the stamped self-assessment or the assessment served, with its date.
- Both deeds, of acquisition and of transfer. For inheritances, the Inheritance Tax paperwork showing the declared value.
- The IBI bill for the year the tax fell due, with the split between land and building.
- The town's tax bylaw in force on that date, which is what sets the coefficients and the rate.
- The proof of payment, which is what proves the payment whose refund is being requested.
With that, the calculation is done under both methods, compared with what was paid, and it becomes clear whether there is a difference and how large. If there is, the route is chosen from the table above. If there is not, we say so and do not claim: a claim with no difference only wastes time and credibility.
Our method with your plusvalía
We review the whole file, calculate under both methods, identify whether yours is a self-assessment or an assessment, and bring the appropriate route with the documents that support it. When the deadline has already passed, we say so on day one. It starts with the plusvalía municipal intake form, with the payment document to hand, because the date on it is the first thing to look at. And the usual warning, which is especially relevant here: a well-framed claim greatly improves the odds, but no outcome is certain until it is decided.
What claiming costs, and when it is worth it
Before starting a procedure it is worth doing a sum almost nobody does: how much you are trying to recover, how much it costs to try, and what reasonable likelihood there is. It is not a sum that can be settled with a general rule, but it does have fairly clear steps.
| Stage | What it involves |
|---|---|
| Rectification or appeal for reconsideration | A written submission, documents and waiting. No fees and no costs orders. It is the stage at which most cases with clear numbers are resolved |
| Economic-administrative claim, where one exists | It lengthens the procedure but does not produce costs orders either. It is usually worthwhile when the amount in dispute is significant |
| Judicial review before the courts | Now there is a court agent (procurador), a lawyer and a costs regime that can work against you. Whether or not to go depends on the amount, the court's approach and the strength of the file |
What decides these matters is usually not the legal argument, which has been fairly settled since the 2021 reform, but the evidence: the two deeds, the land split and a properly done comparison of the methods. A flawless submission on an incomplete file loses; a complete file with a plain submission usually does not.
Interest and how the money is paid
When a refund of an undue payment is agreed, it covers the amount paid, any surcharges and costs paid, and late-payment interest from the date of payment until payment is ordered, without the taxpayer having to ask for it. It is worth checking that the decision includes them, because they are not always worked out correctly, and worth providing from the start a working bank account in the name of the person claiming: it is the second reason for delays, after missing documents.
Before anything else, check the date
Everything above depends on a fact printed on the document itself: the date the self-assessment was filed or the date the assessment was served. It is the first thing we look at in every file, even before doing any calculation, because it decides whether there is a route or not. A case that is excellent on the merits and out of time on the form cannot be rescued with arguments, and promising otherwise would be misleading the client.
Questions that come up with “How to reclaim a plusvalía paid in excess”
Your municipal capital gains, with the price closed first
You know what it costs before we start.
Start here